I look at the world of fauna and flora around me, and it becomes completely obvious that it can not be explained by the processes of natural selection.

Natural selection would have done a better job.

That's why, I believe in unintelligent design. The sheer idiocy of it all has to be explained by something, doesn's it?

A mentally retarded creator? A flawed plan? An idea improperly thought out? Or an idea enacted hastily? (Six days, by the way, has always seemed to me to be rushing things.)

Furthermore, wouldn't natural selection have produced creatures capable of appreciating natural selection?

There is the unreasonable assumption that a bad, poorly functioning machine needs less explanation than a good, well designed machine. I disagree. That's another reason why I'm a proponent of the principle of unintelligent design.